A Rising ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Affluence and Hardship Now Sit Side by Side in Across England.
In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, inhabitants occupy properties only a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in nearby Scartho. One 1.8-metre-high barricade literally divides the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off paths and streets that once connected them.
“It’s the divide between rich and poor,” remarked a resident, 37. “It’s been like this since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to associate with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from government figures reveals how deep inequality can run, sometimes over nothing more than a short distance of tarmac, a line of hedges or a barrier. Years of budget cuts and lack of funding have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now have a neighbourhood ranking as one of the most deprived in the country.
This geographical widening of deprivation has coincided with a significant rise in the quantity of places where disadvantaged and well-off residents end up as immediate neighbours. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods bordered one of the wealthiest. This number rose to 119 in the most recent data.
A Wall That Does More Than Separate Space
At this Lincolnshire site, the divide is the most pronounced in the country and starkly obvious. The barrier is much more than a symbolic division; it causes very real difficulties for daily routines.
- School runs that should take 15-20 minutes become an hour-long journey.
- Reaching key amenities like grocery stores, schools and employment centres is made more difficult.
- The area can attract antisocial behaviour, with instances of litter being thrown over the wall and other issues.
“You try to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” said one local, gesturing towards the corroded barricade.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Challenges
At a local community centre, staff stress that support transcends postcodes. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” said director Tracey Good.
Regardless of being placed in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate boasts a strong sense and feeling of togetherness among its inhabitants. By contrast, the neighbouring area is classified among the most prosperous 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This pattern is mirrored across the country. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of areas in the country. It is immediately adjacent by large houses built in the 2000s that are in the wealthiest tenth for employment and quality of surroundings.
“They may possess bigger houses, but here there’s a stronger community,” said a long-term resident, aged 63. “You’ll probably find a lot of people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”
The economic gap is evident: an average family home sells for about £275,000 on the estate, while across the divide equivalent homes fetch about £410,000.
Locals describe a tangible sense of neglect. “This part of the community is neglected,” said resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our amenities have gradually disappeared, and most of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The rise in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a picture of an increasingly divided England, where prosperity and deprivation are often uncomfortably close neighbours.